Harding v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Harding v. Selsky

295 A.D.2d 666, 742 N.Y.S.2d 923, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5867

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 6, 2002

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 295 A.D.2d 666 (Harding v. Selsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harding v. Selsky, 295 A.D.2d 666, 742 N.Y.S.2d 923, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5867 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Franklin County) to review two determinations of the Commissioner of Correctional [667]*667Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules prohibiting possession of a weapon and assault on another inmate. The separate determinations have now been administratively reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional records. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the matter is dismissed as moot (see, Matter of Curtis v Goord, 274 AD2d 808; Matter of Maldonado v Miller, 259 AD2d 912).

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Spain, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Franklin County) to review two determinations of the Commissioner of Correctional [667]*667Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules prohibiting possession of a weapon and assault on another inmate. The separate determinations have now been administratively reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional records. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the matter is dismissed as moot (see, Matter of Curtis v Goord, 274 AD2d 808; Matter of Maldonado v Miller, 259 AD2d 912).

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Spain, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

295 A.D.2d 666, 742 N.Y.S.2d 923, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5867, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harding-v-selsky-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack