Harding v. Kuessner
80 Ill. App. 353, 1898 Ill. App. LEXIS 431
This text of 80 Ill. App. 353 (Harding v. Kuessner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Harding v. Kuessner, 80 Ill. App. 353, 1898 Ill. App. LEXIS 431 (Ill. Ct. App. 1899).
Opinion
This was an appeal from an interlocutory order. The only question involved is the sufficiency of a creditor’s bill. Affirmed on authority of Bowen v. Parkhurst, 24 Ill. 257; First Natl. Bank v. Gage, 79 Ill. 207; Dormueil v. Ward, 108 Ill. 216; Edwards v. Rogers, 41 Ill. App. 405.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bowen v. Parkhurst
24 Ill. 257 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1860)
First National Bank v. Gage
79 Ill. 207 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1875)
Dormueil v. Ward
108 Ill. 216 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1883)
Edwards v. Rodgers
41 Ill. App. 405 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1891)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
80 Ill. App. 353, 1898 Ill. App. LEXIS 431, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harding-v-kuessner-illappct-1899.