Harding v. Field
32 N.Y.S. 1143, 91 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 540, 65 N.Y. St. Rep. 875
This text of 32 N.Y.S. 1143 (Harding v. Field) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Harding v. Field, 32 N.Y.S. 1143, 91 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 540, 65 N.Y. St. Rep. 875 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).
Opinion
We are of opinion that the order in this case should have required an undertaking from the plaintiff in the sum of §250 to meet the costs accruing upon the appeal taken by the plaintiff, and that security for past costs should not have been required. The order should be modified accordingly, and affirmed as modified, without costs to either party.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
32 N.Y.S. 1143, 91 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 540, 65 N.Y. St. Rep. 875, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harding-v-field-nysupct-1895.