Hardin v. The Register

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Hardin v. The Register

16 Ky. 28, 1807 Ky. LEXIS 2

DecidedJanuary 23, 1807

StatusPublished

This text of 16 Ky. 28 (Hardin v. The Register) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hardin v. The Register, 16 Ky. 28, 1807 Ky. LEXIS 2 (Ky. Ct. App. 1807).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion of

the Court.

THE certificate from the county court of Henderson on which the plat and certificate of survey is founded, is as follows, to wit:

“ Henderson County, Sct. Nov. County Court, 1801.

“George Hardin and Nathaniel Hardin this day claimed 800 acres of land, on account of settling the same agreeably to an act of assembly entitled, “ an act for settling and improving the vacant lands of this commonwealth,” lying on the east fork of Deer Creek, beginning at John Ashley’s east corner, running eastwardly and southwardly and westwardly for quantity, to include their improvement. Satisfactory proof being made to the court, they are of opinion that the said George Hardin and Nathaniel Hardin have a right to a settlement of 800 acres of land, to include the above location, and that a certificate issue accordingly.”

It would certainly have been more strictly conformable to law, had the court granted a certificate to each of these persons for 400 acres of land, to include his own improvement. But as the commonwealth, by the agency of the court, has granted to them a joint certificate, or two certificates in one, for 800 acres, to include their improvements, which implies that each of them had a distinct improvement, (at least as to the commonwealth, it should be so construed and taken,) this court is of opinion, that the Register ought to receive this plat and [29]*29certificate, and register the same on receiving a double fee.

Wherefore, it is considered by the court, that a peremptory mandamus be awarded the said George and Nathaniel Hardin accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion of

the Court.

THE certificate from the county court of Henderson on which the plat and certificate of survey is founded, is as follows, to wit:

“ Henderson County, Sct. Nov. County Court, 1801.

“George Hardin and Nathaniel Hardin this day claimed 800 acres of land, on account of settling the same agreeably to an act of assembly entitled, “ an act for settling and improving the vacant lands of this commonwealth,” lying on the east fork of Deer Creek, beginning at John Ashley’s east corner, running eastwardly and southwardly and westwardly for quantity, to include their improvement. Satisfactory proof being made to the court, they are of opinion that the said George Hardin and Nathaniel Hardin have a right to a settlement of 800 acres of land, to include the above location, and that a certificate issue accordingly.”

It would certainly have been more strictly conformable to law, had the court granted a certificate to each of these persons for 400 acres of land, to include his own improvement. But as the commonwealth, by the agency of the court, has granted to them a joint certificate, or two certificates in one, for 800 acres, to include their improvements, which implies that each of them had a distinct improvement, (at least as to the commonwealth, it should be so construed and taken,) this court is of opinion, that the Register ought to receive this plat and [29]*29certificate, and register the same on receiving a double fee.

Wherefore, it is considered by the court, that a peremptory mandamus be awarded the said George and Nathaniel Hardin accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 Ky. 28, 1807 Ky. LEXIS 2, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hardin-v-the-register-kyctapp-1807.