Hardin v. State
26 Tex. 113
Opinion
There is nothing in the evidence to sustain the allegation in the indictment that Hardin made an assault upon William A. Rathburn-, and shot and wounded him. The evidence shows that some person by the name of Rathburn was shot by Hardin, but it does not show that William A. Rathburn, the party named in the indictment, was shot. Hardin moved for a new trial on the ground that the verdict was contrary to the evidence. The motion ought to have been sustained.
The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hardin v. State, 26 Tex. 113 (Tex. 1861).
26 Tex. 113 (Hardin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Barnett v. State
294 S.W.2d 835 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1956)
Milontree v. State
16 S.W. 764 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1891)
Humbard v. State
17 S.W. 126 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1886)
Osborne v. State
14 Tex. Ct. App. 225 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1883)
Goode v. State
2 Tex. Ct. App. 520 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1877)
Lister v. State
1 Tex. Ct. App. 739 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1877)