Hardin v. State

938 So. 2d 578, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 15457, 2006 WL 2682638
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 20, 2006
DocketNo. 1D05-4999
StatusPublished

This text of 938 So. 2d 578 (Hardin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hardin v. State, 938 So. 2d 578, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 15457, 2006 WL 2682638 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

BROWNING, J.

AFFIRMED. See Card v. State, 927 So.2d 200, 203 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (holding that, in a prosecution for driving while license revoked as a habitual traffic offender, a certified copy of the defendant’s driving record is not testimonial hearsay and thus the record’s admission did not implicate the defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to confrontation under Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004)); Sproule v. State, 927 So.2d 46, 47 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (same).

BARFIELD and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Crawford v. Washington
541 U.S. 36 (Supreme Court, 2004)
Card v. State
927 So. 2d 200 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Sproule v. State
927 So. 2d 46 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
938 So. 2d 578, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 15457, 2006 WL 2682638, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hardin-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.