Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Hardin v. Stansel

Hardin v. Stansel

78 S.E. 681, 13 Ga. App. 22, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 9
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 25, 1913·No. 4805·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

I. Where property placed in the hands of a broker for sale is subsequently sold by the owner, the broker is entitled to his commission, if he was the procuring cause of the sale, although the sale was actually consummated by the owner. Graves v. Hunnicutt, 8 Ga. App. 99 (68 S. E. 558); Doonan v. Ives, 73 Ga. 295.

[23] Decided June 25, 1913. Complaint; from city court of Bainbridge — Judge Spooner. March 7, 1913. B. G. Eartsfield, for plaintiff in error. Earrell S Wilson, contra.

2. No error of law is complained of, and the verdict is supported by evidence. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hardin v. Stansel, 78 S.E. 681, 13 Ga. App. 22, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 9 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).

78 S.E. 681 (Hardin v. Stansel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Arnold v. Jowers
115 S.E.2d 623 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1960)
Jones v. Dupree
93 S.E.2d 191 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1956)
Holland v. King
33 S.E.2d 275 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1945)
Johnson v. Lipscomb-Weyman-Chapman Co.
169 S.E. 266 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Wilcox v. Wilcox
119 S.E. 445 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Collier v. Holland
100 S.E. 654 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)