Hardin v. King Lumber Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Hardin v. King Lumber Co.

159 S.E. 296, 43 Ga. App. 473, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 431

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 19, 1931

Docket21538

StatusPublished

This text of 159 S.E. 296 (Hardin v. King Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hardin v. King Lumber Co., 159 S.E. 296, 43 Ga. App. 473, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 431 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, O. J.

1. The court did not err in any of its rulings upon the pleadings.

2. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence; and as the motion [474]*474for a new trial contained tlie usual general grounds only, tlie refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Decided June 19, 1931. Zaclt Arnold, A. M. Zellner, II. A. Wilkinson, for plaintiff in error. James W. Harris, B. L. Williams, Jr., Bennet ■& Peacock, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Luhe, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI