Hardin v. Kateh

Fourth Circuit

Hardin v. Kateh

459 F. App'x 289

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 22, 2011·No. No. 11-1819·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Shirley R. Hardin appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hardin v. Kateh, No. 3:10-cv-00260-FDW-DSC, 2011 WL 2535038 (W.D.N.C. June 27, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Shirley R. Hardin appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hardin v. Kateh, No. 3:10-cv-00260-FDW-DSC, 2011 WL 2535038 (W.D.N.C. June 27, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Hardin v. Kateh, 459 F. App'x 289 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

459 F. App'x 289 (Hardin v. Kateh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.