Hardin v. Foster

29 S.E. 174, 102 Ga. 180, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 484
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedAugust 5, 1897
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 29 S.E. 174 (Hardin v. Foster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hardin v. Foster, 29 S.E. 174, 102 Ga. 180, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 484 (Ga. 1897).

Opinion

Lumpkin, P. J.

The act of February 28, 1876 (Acts of 1876,' p: 105), now embraced in section 4849 of the Civil Code, rendered it compulsory upon the judge, in the trial of proceedings for equitable relief, upon the request of either party, made after the case had been called for trial and before the beginning of the introduction of evidence, to require of the jury “a special verdict of the facts only” in the case. But even before the passage of this act, the law declaring that, in [181]*181equity cases, “special verdicts may be found by the jury,” now found in section 4850 of the Civil Code, had long been of force. See Lake v. Hardee, 57 Ga. 459, 466. The case now in hand was an equitable proceeding, and the judge, though no request to that effect was made, properly exercised his discretion in framing and submitting to the jury specific questions, and directing them to render a special verdict upon the issues of fact involved.

The evidence was decidedly conflicting, but was sufficient to warrant the findings returned by the jury in answer to the questions propounded to them. Save as to the matter of practice above dealt with, the case involves no question of law; and it would therefore be unprofitable to set forth here a statement of the facts. The decree was not in precise accord with the findings of the jury, but the error committed in rendering it has been corrected by an appropriate direction, and it is therefore unnecessary to reverse the judgment or order a new trial.

Judgment affirmed, with direction.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Dodd
159 S.E.2d 405 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1968)
West v. Housing Authority of City of Atlanta
84 S.E.2d 30 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1954)
Everette v. Mahaffey
69 S.E.2d 769 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1952)
Turner v. Hardy
32 S.E.2d 483 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1944)
Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Saul
5 S.E.2d 214 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Robertson v. Aycock
153 S.E. 213 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1930)
McWhorter v. Ford
83 S.E. 134 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 S.E. 174, 102 Ga. 180, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hardin-v-foster-ga-1897.