Hardin, Billy Pink

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 22, 2009·No. PD-0866-08·Published

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. PD-0866-08


BILLY PINK HARDIN, Appellant


v.


THE STATE OF TEXAS




ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS

DALLAS COUNTY




           Per curiam. KEASLER and HERVEY, JJ., dissent.


ORDER

           The petition for discretionary review violates Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.3, 68.4(i), and 68.5 because the original petition is not accompanied by 11 copies, does not contain a copy of the opinion of the court of appeals, and grounds and reasons for review are longer than 15 pages.

           The petition is struck. See Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.6.

           The petitioner may redraw the petition. The redrawn petition and copies must be filed in the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS within thirty days after the date of this order.


Filed: April 22, 2009

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hardin, Billy Pink, (Tex. 2009).

Hardin, Billy Pink (Hardin, Billy Pink) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.