Hardiman v. State

307 S.W.2d 584, 1957 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2908
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided December 4, 1957·No. No. 29310·Published

Opinion

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

The offense is the unlawful possession of beer and wine in a dry area; the punishment, three months in jail and a fine of $300.

Our able State’s Attorney confesses error because the record is silent as to the dry status of the area where the offense is alleged to have occurred, and we agree. Recently, in Weatherman v. State, 161 Tex.Cr.R. 272, 276 S.W.2d 524, we cited a number of cases which announce the consistent holding of this Court that the dry status of the area must be proven or established by agreement of the parties.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hardiman v. State, 307 S.W.2d 584, 1957 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2908 (Tex. 1957).

307 S.W.2d 584 (Hardiman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Weatherman v. State
276 S.W.2d 524 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1955)