Harder v. Gray

Oregon Supreme Court

Harder v. Gray

505 P.2d 347, 264 Or. 284, 1973 Ore. LEXIS 461

CourtOregon Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 19, 1973

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 505 P.2d 347 (Harder v. Gray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harder v. Gray, 505 P.2d 347, 264 Or. 284, 1973 Ore. LEXIS 461 (Or. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

DENECKE, J.

Plaintiff was injured while a guest passenger in defendant’s car. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of nonsuit rendered in the ensuing damage action.

ORS 30.115 provides that a guest passenger cannot recover (1) “unless the accident was intentional on the part of the owner or operator or caused by his gross negligence or intoxication.” The issue is whether there is any evidence of gross negligence or intoxication. Plaintiff’s argument seems to be threefold: (1) the physical facts of the occurrence are evidence of gross negligence; (2) there was evidence that plaintiff had been drinking and this, plus evidence of simple negligence, was evidence of gross negligence; and (3) there was evidence that defendant was intoxicated.

We readily conclude that the physical facts of this occurrence cannot create an inference of gross negligence and there is no evidence that defendant was intoxicated.

Plaintiff’s other contention is also not well taken but merits some comment. The defendant, age 17, had three bottles of beer between 7:30 and 9:00 p.m. He thereafter became “sick.” We will assume it could be inferred he became “sick” from drinking the beer. About 12:30 a.m. the next morning the car defendant was driving went off the road and plaintiff was injured. The only direct evidence was that the car went off the road because of loose gravel on the road surface or the failure of the steering mechanism. There is no evidence from which an inference can be drawn [286]*286that the beer the defendant drank at least three and one-half hours before had any effect upon his driving. In this state of the record there is no evidence of gross negligence. Stites v. Morgan, 229 Or 116, 121, 366 P2d 324 (1961), had evidence more favorable to the plaintiff guest. We held, however, that it was not sufficient to make out a case of gross negligence.

Affirmed.

McAllister, J., concurs in the result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DENECKE, J.

Plaintiff was injured while a guest passenger in defendant’s car. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of nonsuit rendered in the ensuing damage action.

ORS 30.115 provides that a guest passenger cannot recover (1) “unless the accident was intentional on the part of the owner or operator or caused by his gross negligence or intoxication.” The issue is whether there is any evidence of gross negligence or intoxication. Plaintiff’s argument seems to be threefold: (1) the physical facts of the occurrence are evidence of gross negligence; (2) there was evidence that plaintiff had been drinking and this, plus evidence of simple negligence, was evidence of gross negligence; and (3) there was evidence that defendant was intoxicated.

We readily conclude that the physical facts of this occurrence cannot create an inference of gross negligence and there is no evidence that defendant was intoxicated.

Plaintiff’s other contention is also not well taken but merits some comment. The defendant, age 17, had three bottles of beer between 7:30 and 9:00 p.m. He thereafter became “sick.” We will assume it could be inferred he became “sick” from drinking the beer. About 12:30 a.m. the next morning the car defendant was driving went off the road and plaintiff was injured. The only direct evidence was that the car went off the road because of loose gravel on the road surface or the failure of the steering mechanism. There is no evidence from which an inference can be drawn [286]*286that the beer the defendant drank at least three and one-half hours before had any effect upon his driving. In this state of the record there is no evidence of gross negligence. Stites v. Morgan, 229 Or 116, 121, 366 P2d 324 (1961), had evidence more favorable to the plaintiff guest. We held, however, that it was not sufficient to make out a case of gross negligence.

Affirmed.

McAllister, J., concurs in the result.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

505 P.2d 347, 264 Or. 284, 1973 Ore. LEXIS 461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harder-v-gray-or-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack