Harder v. Carter
This text of 23 S.E. 82 (Harder v. Carter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Even if the machinery for the agreed price of which the action was brought was in fact defective or worthless, yet as the defendant, after the most complete and ample opportunities for trying and testing it, and,with full knowledge of its character and of all its alleged defects, deliberately promised in writing to pay for it, she could not thereafter set up in resistance to such action the defense of failure of consideration predicated upon alleged defectiveness or worthlessness of the machinery. Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 S.E. 82, 97 Ga. 273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harder-v-carter-ga-1895.