Hardenbergh v. Thompson

New York Supreme Court

Hardenbergh v. Thompson

1 Johns. 61

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 15, 1806

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 1 Johns. 61 (Hardenbergh v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hardenbergh v. Thompson, 1 Johns. 61 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1806).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The rule to join in error ought to have been personally served on the defendant. It was so decided, in October term 18.01, in error, on certiorari, .where a motion for judgment of reversal on default, for not joining in error, though not opposed, was denied, it appear- . ing, that no attorney had been employed by the defendant in error, and that the notice had been put up in the clerk’s office.

Rule granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The rule to join in error ought to have been personally served on the defendant. It was so decided, in October term 18.01, in error, on certiorari, .where a motion for judgment of reversal on default, for not joining in error, though not opposed, was denied, it appear- . ing, that no attorney had been employed by the defendant in error, and that the notice had been put up in the clerk’s office.

Rule granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Johns. 61, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hardenbergh-v-thompson-nysupct-1806.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack