Harden v. . Stockard

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Harden v. . Stockard

200 S.E. 409, 214 N.C. 848, 1939 N.C. LEXIS 439

DecidedJanuary 4, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 200 S.E. 409 (Harden v. . Stockard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harden v. . Stockard, 200 S.E. 409, 214 N.C. 848, 1939 N.C. LEXIS 439 (N.C. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Civil action to restrain sale under execution.

From judgment dissolving the temporary restraining order and dismissing the action, the plaintiffs appeal, assigning errors. The basis of the judgment is that the rights of all the parties, judgment creditor, mortgagees, and debtors, are to be determined according to what appears upon the public records of Alamance County. In this, there is no error. Armstrong v. Price, 203 N.C. 833, 167 S.E. 77; Bank v.Sauls, 183 N.C. 165, 110 S.E. 865; Callahan v. Flack, 205 N.C. 105,170 S.E. 125.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Civil action to restrain sale under execution.

From judgment dissolving the temporary restraining order and dismissing the action, the plaintiffs appeal, assigning errors. The basis of the judgment is that the rights of all the parties, judgment creditor, mortgagees, and debtors, are to be determined according to what appears upon the public records of Alamance County. In this, there is no error. Armstrong v. Price, 203 N.C. 833, 167 S.E. 77; Bank v.Sauls, 183 N.C. 165, 110 S.E. 865; Callahan v. Flack, 205 N.C. 105,170 S.E. 125.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

200 S.E. 409, 214 N.C. 848, 1939 N.C. LEXIS 439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harden-v-stockard-nc-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack