Harden v. Stockard
214 N.C. 848
Opinion
The basis of the judgment is that the rights of all the parties, judgment creditor, mortgagees, and debtors, are to be determined according to what appears upon the public records of Alamance County. In this, there is no error. Armstrong v. Price, 203 N. C., 833, 167 S. E., 77; Bank v. Sauls, 183 N. C., 165, 110 S. E., 865; Callahan v. Flack, 205 N. C., 105, 170 S. E., 125.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harden v. Stockard, 214 N.C. 848 (N.C. 1939).
214 N.C. 848 (Harden v. Stockard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Callahan v. . Flack
170 S.E. 125 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1933)
First National Bank v. Sauls
110 S.E. 865 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1922)
Armstrong v. . Price
167 S.E. 77 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1933)