Harden v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Harden v. State

1928 OK CR 9, 262 P. 1119, 38 Okla. Crim. 395, 1928 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 355

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 7, 1928

DocketNo. A-6254.

StatusPublished

This text of 1928 OK CR 9 (Harden v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harden v. State, 1928 OK CR 9, 262 P. 1119, 38 Okla. Crim. 395, 1928 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 355 (Okla. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted . in the county court of Alfalfa county on a charge of selling whisky, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $200 and to serve a term of 180 days in the county jail. The judgment in this case was rendered on March 29, 1926. The appeal was lodged in this court on May 26, 1926. No brief in support of said appeal has been filed, and no appearance for oral argument wás made at the time the case was submitted. An examination of the record discloses that the information correctly charges the offense, the evidence sustains the verdict, the issues were fairly submitted, and no substantial error is apparent. The case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted . in the county court of Alfalfa county on a charge of selling whisky, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $200 and to serve a term of 180 days in the county jail. The judgment in this case was rendered on March 29, 1926. The appeal was lodged in this court on May 26, 1926. No brief in support of said appeal has been filed, and no appearance for oral argument wás made at the time the case was submitted. An examination of the record discloses that the information correctly charges the offense, the evidence sustains the verdict, the issues were fairly submitted, and no substantial error is apparent. The case is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1928 OK CR 9, 262 P. 1119, 38 Okla. Crim. 395, 1928 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harden-v-state-oklacrimapp-1928.