Harden v. State
183 S.E. 115, 52 Ga. App. 307, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 149
This text of 183 S.E. 115 (Harden v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Harden v. State, 183 S.E. 115, 52 Ga. App. 307, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 149 (Ga. Ct. App. 1935).
Opinion
Under the facts as disclosed by the record, the court erred in overruling the defendant’s motion for a continuance, based on the absence of a material witness who had been subpoenaed for the defense; and that error rendered further proceedings nugatory.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
183 S.E. 115, 52 Ga. App. 307, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harden-v-state-gactapp-1935.