Harden v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Harden v. State

192 S.E. 829, 184 Ga. 698, 1937 Ga. LEXIS 620

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 15, 1937

DocketNo. 11903

StatusPublished

This text of 192 S.E. 829 (Harden v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harden v. State, 192 S.E. 829, 184 Ga. 698, 1937 Ga. LEXIS 620 (Ga. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

I-Iutcheson, Justice.

1. The alleged newly discovered evidence set out in the only special ground of the motion for new trial is not such as would probably produce a different result on another trial of the case.

2. The evidence was sufficient to authorize the verdict, and the court did not-err in overruling the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Beck, P. J., and Bell, J., absent because of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

I-Iutcheson, Justice.

1. The alleged newly discovered evidence set out in the only special ground of the motion for new trial is not such as would probably produce a different result on another trial of the case.

2. The evidence was sufficient to authorize the verdict, and the court did not-err in overruling the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Beck, P. J., and Bell, J., absent because of illness.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 S.E. 829, 184 Ga. 698, 1937 Ga. LEXIS 620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harden-v-state-ga-1937.