Harden v. Hawkins & Co.

37 S.E. 709, 112 Ga. 498, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 217
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided December 21, 1900·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Cobb, J.

The defendant was sued in the county court on an account, the case being returnable to a monthly term of that court. The court was opened at the usual hour at the term following the return of service, and, no answer having been then filed, a judgment by default against the defendant was written and signed by the judge. Subsequently on the same day, before such judgment was entered on the minutes, the defendant appeared, filed an answer, and moved to open the default. This motion being overruled, the case was appealed to the superior court. Held, that there was no error in sustaining, in the latter court, a motion to strike the answer which had been filed in the county court, and in directing a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. See Freeman v. Carr, 104 Ga. 718.

Judgment affirmed,.

All the Justices concurring, except Fish, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harden v. Hawkins & Co., 37 S.E. 709, 112 Ga. 498, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 217 (Ga. 1900).

37 S.E. 709 (Harden v. Hawkins & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. Brown
79 S.E. 1113 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1913)