Harden v. Hawkins & Co.
This text of 37 S.E. 709 (Harden v. Hawkins & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant was sued in the county court on an account, the case being returnable to a monthly term of that court. The court was opened at the usual hour at the term following the return of service, and, no answer having been then filed, a judgment by default against the defendant was written and signed by the judge. Subsequently on the same day, before such judgment was entered on the minutes, the defendant appeared, filed an answer, and moved to open the default. This motion being overruled, the case was appealed to the superior court. Held, that there was no error in sustaining, in the latter court, a motion to strike the answer which had been filed in the county court, and in directing a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. See Freeman v. Carr, 104 Ga. 718.
Judgment affirmed,.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
37 S.E. 709, 112 Ga. 498, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harden-v-hawkins-co-ga-1900.