Hardeman v. State

891 S.W.2d 960, 1995 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 8
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 1, 1995
DocketNo. 031-94
StatusPublished

This text of 891 S.W.2d 960 (Hardeman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hardeman v. State, 891 S.W.2d 960, 1995 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 8 (Tex. 1995).

Opinion

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

MANSFIELD, Judge.

A jury found appellant guilty of aggravated assault. The trial court assessed punishment at five years confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice — Institutional Division. The Court of Appeals affirmed appellant’s conviction. Hardeman v. State, 868 S.W.2d 404 (Tex.App.—Austin 1993).

After careful review of the petition for discretionary review and the opinion of the Court of Appeals, we have determined that appellant’s petition for discretionary review was improvidently granted.

Appellant’s petition for discretionary review is dismissed.

CLINTON, J., dissents. KELLER, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hardeman v. State
868 S.W.2d 404 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
891 S.W.2d 960, 1995 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 8, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hardeman-v-state-texcrimapp-1995.