Hardeman v. State
256 S.W. 1117, 96 Tex. Crim. 266, 1924 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 15
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hardeman v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 94 Tex. Crim. 642 →
Opinion
— Appellant Appellant was convicted in the County Court at Law of Tarrant County of running a bawdy house, and her punishment fixed at a fine of $200 and twenty days in jail
The record is devoid of statemént of facts or hills of exception. A number of special charges were asked but in the absence of the facts given in testimony we are unable to determine the question of any error involved in their refusal. The complaint sufficiently charges a violation of the law. No error appearing, an affirmance will be ordered.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hardeman v. State, 256 S.W. 1117, 96 Tex. Crim. 266, 1924 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 15 (Tex. 1924).
256 S.W. 1117 (Hardeman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.