Hardee v. State

257 So. 2d 298
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 8, 1972·No. No. P-415·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. Hines v. State (Fla.App.1966) 186 So.2d 820, quashed by State v. Hines (Fla.1967) 195 So.2d 550; Odom v. State (Fla.1959) 109 So.2d 163.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hardee v. State, 257 So. 2d 298 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

257 So. 2d 298 (Hardee v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Hines
195 So. 2d 550 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1967)
Odom v. State
109 So. 2d 163 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1959)
Hines v. State
186 So. 2d 820 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)