Hardee v. Hardee

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hardee v. Hardee

894 So. 2d 1082, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 2668, 2005 WL 491407

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hardee v. Hardee. Read the opinion of the Court — 929 So. 2d 714 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 4, 2005·No. No. 1D04-5630·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of January 24, 2005, the Court has determined that the appellant’s untimely motion for rehearing did not delay rendition of the underlying final judgment. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.530(b); Fla. R.App. P. 9.020(h). Thus, the notice of appeal was insufficient to timely invoke the Court’s jurisdiction. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed as untimely.

WEBSTER, PADOVANO and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of January 24, 2005, the Court has determined that the appellant’s untimely motion for rehearing did not delay rendition of the underlying final judgment. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.530(b); Fla. R.App. P. 9.020(h). Thus, the notice of appeal was insufficient to timely invoke the Court’s jurisdiction. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed as untimely.

WEBSTER, PADOVANO and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Hardee v. Hardee, 894 So. 2d 1082, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 2668, 2005 WL 491407 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

894 So. 2d 1082 (Hardee v. Hardee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.