Hardee v. Bank of Donalsonville
86 S.E. 938, 144 Ga. 289, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 168
Opinion
The legal principles controlling this ease are defined in Taylor v. Williams, 139 Ga. 581 (77 S. E. 386), and Pincus v. Meinhard, 139 Ga. 365 (77 S. E. 82); and the judge did not abuse his discretion in refusing to appoint a receiver and grant an injunction as prayed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hardee v. Bank of Donalsonville, 86 S.E. 938, 144 Ga. 289, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 168 (Ga. 1915).
86 S.E. 938 (Hardee v. Bank of Donalsonville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Morris Fertilizer Co. v. White, McCurdy & Co.
122 S.E. 692 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1924)
Strickland Hardware Co. v. Fletcher
110 S.E. 229 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1921)