Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Hardcastle v. Stiles

Hardcastle v. Stiles

59 A. 1117, 70 N.J.L. 828, 1904 N.J. LEXIS 172
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 30, 1904·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment in this cause is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Mr. Justice Van Syekel in the Supreme Court, reported, in 40 Vroom 551.

For affirmance — Tiie Chancellor., Dixon, G-arrison, Fort, Pitney, Swayzb, Bogert, AHiedenbuegii, Vroom, Green, Gray. 11. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hardcastle v. Stiles, 59 A. 1117, 70 N.J.L. 828, 1904 N.J. LEXIS 172 (N.J. 1904).

59 A. 1117 (Hardcastle v. Stiles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hardcastle v. Stiles & McClay
55 A. 104 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1903)