Hardcastle v. State

1939 OK CR 105, 93 P.2d 547, 67 Okla. Crim. 202, 1939 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 131
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedAugust 18, 1939
DocketNo. A-9614.
StatusPublished

This text of 1939 OK CR 105 (Hardcastle v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hardcastle v. State, 1939 OK CR 105, 93 P.2d 547, 67 Okla. Crim. 202, 1939 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 131 (Okla. Ct. App. 1939).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was tried in the superior court of Seminole county upon an information charging that in said county, on or about the 25th day of December, 1936, he did kill and murder one Paul Coffey, by shooting him with a pistol. The jury by their verdict found him guilty of manslaughter in the first degree, and assessed his punishment at imprisonment in the state penitentiary for the term of seven years. From the judgment rendered on the 27th day of September, 1938, an appeal was perfected by filing in this court on March 27, 1939, a petition in error with case-made.

Since the appeal was taken, and before the final submission of the case, plaintiff in error departed this life as shown by the motion of his counsel of record, filed in this court August 14, 1939, averring that on the 28th day of July, 1939, the said Clell Hardcastle, plaintiff in *203 error, departed this life in Clay county, 111., and in support thereof presents herewith the affidavit of H. D. Fehrenbacker, a duly licensed and practicing physician and surgeon within the state of Illinois, wherein affiant states “That he is a regularly licensed and practicing physician and surgeon within the state of Illinois. Affiant further states that A. C., or Clell, Hardcastle was critically injured in an automobile-truck collision and as a result of the injuries received thereby, died in Clay county, 111., on July 26, 1939. Affiant further states that he was in attendance upon the said A. C., or Clell, Hardcastle at the time of his death.

In a criminal prosecution, the purpose of the proceeding being to punish the accused, the action must necessarily abate upon his death, and, where it is made to appear that the plaintiff in error died pending the determination of his appeal, the cause will be abated. Deweese v. State, 62 Okla. Cr. 6, 69 P. 2d 404; Yota v. State, 10 Okla. Cr. 26, 133 P. 257; Martin v. State, 38 Okla. Cr. 309, 260 P. 780.

It is therefore considered, adjudged, and ordered that the proceedings in the above entitled cause be abated ¿ cause remanded, with direction to the trial court to enter its appropriate order to that effect.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Yota v. State
1913 OK CR 249 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1913)
Deweese v. State
1937 OK CR 100 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1937)
Martin v. State
1927 OK CR 338 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1939 OK CR 105, 93 P.2d 547, 67 Okla. Crim. 202, 1939 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hardcastle-v-state-oklacrimapp-1939.