Harcon Barge Co., Inc. v. D & G Boat Rentals, Inc., Third-Party M/v Charles D, Cross-Appellant v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co., Third-Party Cross-Appellee. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. M/v I.C. Hoskins, Her Engines, Boilers, Tackle, Etc., in Rem, Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. M/v Iberville, Her Engines, Boilers, Tackle, Etc., in Rem, Southern Pacific Transportation Co., Cross-Appellee v. M/v Charles D., Her Engines, Boilers, Tackle, Etc., in Rem, and D & G Boat Rentals, Inc., Cross-Appellants. Southern Pacific Transportation Co., Cross-Appellee v. M/v Marion Hagestad, Cross-Appellants

760 F.2d 86
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedApril 23, 1985
Docket82-4584
StatusPublished

This text of 760 F.2d 86 (Harcon Barge Co., Inc. v. D & G Boat Rentals, Inc., Third-Party M/v Charles D, Cross-Appellant v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co., Third-Party Cross-Appellee. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. M/v I.C. Hoskins, Her Engines, Boilers, Tackle, Etc., in Rem, Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. M/v Iberville, Her Engines, Boilers, Tackle, Etc., in Rem, Southern Pacific Transportation Co., Cross-Appellee v. M/v Charles D., Her Engines, Boilers, Tackle, Etc., in Rem, and D & G Boat Rentals, Inc., Cross-Appellants. Southern Pacific Transportation Co., Cross-Appellee v. M/v Marion Hagestad, Cross-Appellants) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harcon Barge Co., Inc. v. D & G Boat Rentals, Inc., Third-Party M/v Charles D, Cross-Appellant v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co., Third-Party Cross-Appellee. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. M/v I.C. Hoskins, Her Engines, Boilers, Tackle, Etc., in Rem, Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. M/v Iberville, Her Engines, Boilers, Tackle, Etc., in Rem, Southern Pacific Transportation Co., Cross-Appellee v. M/v Charles D., Her Engines, Boilers, Tackle, Etc., in Rem, and D & G Boat Rentals, Inc., Cross-Appellants. Southern Pacific Transportation Co., Cross-Appellee v. M/v Marion Hagestad, Cross-Appellants, 760 F.2d 86 (3d Cir. 1985).

Opinion

760 F.2d 86

HARCON BARGE CO., INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
D & G BOAT RENTALS, INC., Defendant, Third-Party
Plaintiff-Appellant.
M/V CHARLES D, Defendant-Appellee, Cross-Appellant,
v.
SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION CO., Third-Party Defendant,
Appellant Cross-Appellee.
SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION CO., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
M/V I.C. HOSKINS, Her Engines, Boilers, Tackle, Etc., In
Rem, Defendant-Appellee.
SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION CO., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
M/V IBERVILLE, Her Engines, Boilers, Tackle, Etc., In Rem,
et al., Defendants-Appellees.
SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION CO., Plaintiff-Appellant,
Cross-Appellee,
v.
M/V CHARLES D., Her Engines, Boilers, Tackle, Etc., In Rem,
and D & G Boat Rentals, Inc., Defendant-Appellees,
Cross-Appellants.
SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION CO., Plaintiff-Appellant,
Cross-Appellee,
v.
M/V MARION HAGESTAD, et al., Defendants-Appellees, Cross-Appellants.

No. 82-4584.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

April 23, 1985.

Christovich & Kearney, Lawrence J. Ernst, J. Warren Gardner, Jr., New Orleans, La., for Southern Pacific Transp. Co.

Cliffe E. Laborde, III, Lafayette, La., for Tidewater Venice.

Robert McCleskey, New Orleans, La., for M/V Hoskins, and Smith Corp.

Donald King, New Orleans, La., for Marion Haagastad.

Spivey Gault, Greenville, Miss., for M/V Charles D and Harcon Barge.

W. Gerald Gaudet, Lafayette, La., for D & G Boat Rentals.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion November 12, 1984, 746 F.2d 278 (1984))

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, TATE, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS and HILL, Circuit Judges.*

BY THE COURT:

A member of the court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this case shall be reheard en banc by the court, without oral argument, on a date hereafter to be fixed, with regard to Part III of the opinion of the court. In all other respects, rehearing and rehearing en banc is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the rehearing en banc in this case shall be consolidated with the rehearing en banc granted in Case No. 83-3682--Steve Willie v. Continental Oil Co., et al. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs in both cases.

*

Judge Carolyn Dineen Randall is recused, and therefore did not participate in this decision

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harcon Barge Co. v. D & G Boat Rentals, Inc.
760 F.2d 86 (Fifth Circuit, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
760 F.2d 86, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harcon-barge-co-inc-v-d-g-boat-rentals-inc-third-party-mv-charles-ca3-1985.