Harco Industries, Inc. v. Omni-Industries Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Harco Industries, Inc. v. Omni-Industries Corp.

56 A.D.2d 622, 391 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10716

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 22, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 56 A.D.2d 622 (Harco Industries, Inc. v. Omni-Industries Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harco Industries, Inc. v. Omni-Industries Corp., 56 A.D.2d 622, 391 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10716 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated October 27, 1976, which denied their motion for summary judgment as to their causes of action and as to defendants’ counterclaims. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. The plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, both as to their causes of action and as to the defendants’ counterclaims, was properly denied. There are issues of fact which are so interwoven that all claims should be heard together. Rabin, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Titone and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated October 27, 1976, which denied their motion for summary judgment as to their causes of action and as to defendants’ counterclaims. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. The plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, both as to their causes of action and as to the defendants’ counterclaims, was properly denied. There are issues of fact which are so interwoven that all claims should be heard together. Rabin, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Titone and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 A.D.2d 622, 391 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harco-industries-inc-v-omni-industries-corp-nyappdiv-1977.