Harbour v. State

454 S.W.3d 926, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 221, 2015 WL 965731
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 3, 2015·No. WD 76613·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Following a jury trial, Demetrius Har-bour was convicted in the Circuit Court of Jackson County of second-degree murder. After this Court affirmed his conviction, Harbour filed a motion for post-conviction relief under Supreme Court Rule 29.15. The circuit court denied his motion following an evidentiary hearing. Harbour appeals. He argues that his counsel was ineffective because counsel: (1) failed to object to the State’s introduction of evidence concerning a set of brass knuckles which Harbour contends were unrelated to the offense; (2) failed to cross examine the victim’s daughter regarding the timing of her mother’s screams in relation to blows which the victim’s daughter heard; and (3) failed to impeach the victim’s daughter’s testimony with prior inconsistent statements. We -affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harbour v. State, 454 S.W.3d 926, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 221, 2015 WL 965731 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

454 S.W.3d 926 (Harbour v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.