Harbour Breeze Plantation, LLC v. Hurst
937 So. 2d 788, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 15198, 2006 WL 2612710
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 13, 2006·No. No. 1D06-0269·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the court’s order of August 14, 2006, the court has determined that the order does not constitute a final order of dismissal. Specifically, although the order grants a motion to dismiss with regard to a party, the lower tribunal has not yet dismissed the individual as a party to the action. See generally Benton v. Moore, 655 So.2d 1272, 1273 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harbour Breeze Plantation, LLC v. Hurst, 937 So. 2d 788, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 15198, 2006 WL 2612710 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
937 So. 2d 788 (Harbour Breeze Plantation, LLC v. Hurst) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chapman v. Nationsbank
937 So. 2d 788 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)