Harbord v. MTC Financial Inc

District Court, W.D. Washington·Decided March 30, 2020·No. 3:20-cv-05080·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 9 10 DAVID HARBORD and HATSUYO CASE NO. 20-5080 RJB ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 12 Plaintiff, FAX FILING v. 13 MTC FINANCIAL INC., BAYVIEW SERVICING LLC, BAYVIEW CHASE BANK, JP MORGAN 16 FINANCIAL, WELLS FARGO, and VANGUARD GROUP, 17 Defendants. 18

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiff’s Motion for Fax Filing. Dkt. 19 13. The Court has reviewed the motion and record and is fully advised. 20 This case arises from foreclosure proceedings against Hatsuyo Harbord’s real property 21 commonly known as 461 McFarland Drive, Sequim, WA. Dkt. 1. On February 21, 2020, 22 around 4:45 p.m., the Clerk of the Court’s Office received a fax which purported to be from the 23 24 1 Plaintiff. On Feb. 25, 2020, the Court informed the Plaintiff that it would not accept filings by 2 fax. Dkt. 7. 3 The Plaintiff now moves the Court to accept pleadings by fax because of difficulties in 4 getting to the courthouse to hand deliver her pleadings. Dkt. 13.

6 Pursuant to Local Rule W.D. Wash. 5(d), unrepresented parties, like the Plaintiffs here, 7 “may, but are not required to, file electronically.” Unrepresented parties may also file their 8 pleadings by mailing them to the Clerk of the Court. See Fed. Civ. R. P. 5 and Local Civil Rule 9 5. “Electronically” refers to the Court’s electronic case filing system (ECF). The Clerk of the 10 Court does not accept filings by fax. 11 The Plaintiff’s motion to file pleadings by fax (Dkt. 13) should be denied. The Plaintiff 12 is free to mail her pleadings to the Clerk of the Court for filing. The Plaintiff is reminded that 13 “[p]ro se litigants must follow the same rules of procedure that govern other litigants,” Briones v. 14 Riviera Hotel & Casino, 116 F.3d 379, 381 (9th Cir. 1997), including the Federal Rules of Civil

15 Procedure and the Local Civil Rules of the Western District of Washington. 17 The Clerk is directed to send uncertified copies of this Order to all counsel of record and 18 to any party appearing pro se at said party’s last known address. 19 Dated this 30th day of March, 2020. A 20

21 ROBERT J. BRYAN United States District Judge 22

23 24

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harbord v. MTC Financial Inc, (W.D. Wash. 2020).

Harbord v. MTC Financial Inc (Harbord v. MTC Financial Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jesus Briones v. Riviera Hotel & Casino
116 F.3d 379 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)