Harbor Yacht Repair, Inc. v. Sanger

267 So. 2d 51, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6081
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 26, 1972·No. No. 71-111·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This was an appeal from a partial judgment which was styled “final judgment”, entered in an action at law for replevin. This court, ex mero motu, dismisses the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, but without prejudice to review the points on appeal if properly presented after entry of a final judgment. See: 2 Malloy, Florida Appellate Practice and Procedure § 15.13, pp. 225-226, Wabash Life Insurance Company of Indianapolis v. Rosenberg, Fla.App.1965, 177 So.2d 538 (Carroll, J., concurring specially); Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. Young, Fla.App. 1964, 162 So.2d 303, 308.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harbor Yacht Repair, Inc. v. Sanger, 267 So. 2d 51, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6081 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

267 So. 2d 51 (Harbor Yacht Repair, Inc. v. Sanger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Casino, Inc. v. Kugeares
354 So. 2d 936 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Dunson v. Dunson
311 So. 2d 189 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)