Harbor Freight Tools, Inc. and Safety etc. v. Patricia Whitehead

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 18, 2018
Docket17-3194
StatusPublished

This text of Harbor Freight Tools, Inc. and Safety etc. v. Patricia Whitehead (Harbor Freight Tools, Inc. and Safety etc. v. Patricia Whitehead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harbor Freight Tools, Inc. and Safety etc. v. Patricia Whitehead, (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D17-3194 _____________________________

HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS, INC. and SAFETY NATIONAL CASUALTY CORP./CORVEL,

Appellants,

v.

PATRICIA WHITEHEAD,

Appellee. _____________________________

On appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Ralph J. Humphries, Judge.

Date of Accident: May 3, 2015.

May 18, 2018

PER CURIAM.

A judge of compensation claims awarded workers’ compensation benefits based on the so-called “120-day rule,” which generally precludes carriers from denying compensability if they begin paying benefits and do not challenge compensability within 120 days. See § 440.20(4), Fla. Stat. (2015); see also Sierra v. Metropolitan Protective Servs., 188 So. 3d 863, 866-67 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). But “[a] claimant’s ‘defense’ of waiver to an [employer’s] ability to deny compensability of an accident or specific injury/condition pursuant to the ‘120-Day Rule’ is an affirmative pleading which must be timely raised and specifically plead[ed].” Teco Energy, Inc. v. Williams, 234 So. 3d 816, 823 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017). Here the claimant did not specifically plead application of the 120-day rule. The judge of compensation claims therefore erred in awarding benefits based on the rule.

REVERSED.

LEWIS, KELSEY, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Daniel M. Schwarz and Gina M. Jacobs of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Plantation, for Appellants.

Daniel J. Glary, Jacksonville, for Appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sierra v. Metropolitan Protective Services
188 So. 3d 863 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Harbor Freight Tools, Inc. and Safety etc. v. Patricia Whitehead, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harbor-freight-tools-inc-and-safety-etc-v-patricia-whitehead-fladistctapp-2018.