Harbison v. Cuccinelli ex rel. Virginia

413 F. App'x 626
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 28, 2011·No. No. 10-2096·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Paul Renfro Harbison, Jr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his complaint alleging various equal protection and due process violations. We have reviewed the record and [627]*627find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harbison v. Cuccinelli, No. 3:10-cv-00297-REP, 2010 WL 3655977 (E.D.Va. Sept. 10, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harbison v. Cuccinelli ex rel. Virginia, 413 F. App'x 626 (4th Cir. 2011).

413 F. App'x 626 (Harbison v. Cuccinelli ex rel. Virginia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Untitled Case
W.D. North Carolina, 2026
Turner v. Howell
W.D. Virginia, 2023
Harbison v. U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations
839 F. Supp. 2d 99 (District of Columbia, 2012)