Harbison v. Commissioner

68 F.2d 1004, 13 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 637, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 5072, 13 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 637
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedJanuary 8, 1934
DocketNo. 208
StatusPublished

This text of 68 F.2d 1004 (Harbison v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harbison v. Commissioner, 68 F.2d 1004, 13 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 637, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 5072, 13 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 637 (2d Cir. 1934).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The question presented is identical with that decided in Bliss v. Commissioner, 68 F.(2d) 890, handed down herewith. For the reasons there stated, the order must be, and is, reversed.

L. HAND, Circuit Judge, dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bliss v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
68 F.2d 890 (Second Circuit, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 F.2d 1004, 13 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 637, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 5072, 13 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harbison-v-commissioner-ca2-1934.