Harbison v. Commissioner

68 F.2d 1004, 13 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 637, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 5072, 13 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 637
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided January 8, 1934·No. No. 208·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The question presented is identical with that decided in Bliss v. Commissioner, 68 F.(2d) 890, handed down herewith. For the reasons there stated, the order must be, and is, reversed.

L. HAND, Circuit Judge, dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harbison v. Commissioner, 68 F.2d 1004, 13 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 637, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 5072, 13 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 637 (2d Cir. 1934).

68 F.2d 1004 (Harbison v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bliss v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
68 F.2d 890 (Second Circuit, 1934)