Harbison v. C. G. Lewellyn

280 U.S. 560
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 21, 1929
Docket134
StatusPublished

This text of 280 U.S. 560 (Harbison v. C. G. Lewellyn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harbison v. C. G. Lewellyn, 280 U.S. 560 (1929).

Opinion

280 U.S. 560

50 S.Ct. 18

74 L.Ed. 615

Ralph W. HARBISON, petitioner,
v.
C. G. LEWELLYN, formerly collector, etc.; Joseph Hudson BROOKS, petitioner, v. C. G. LEWELLYN, formerly collector, etc.; James E. LEWIS, petitioner, v. C. G. LEWELLYN, formerly collector, etc.; Lee C. MORGANROTH, petitioner, v. C. G. LEWELLYN, formerly collector, etc.; Harry William CROFT, petitioner, v. C. G. LEWELLYN, formerly collector, etc.; Raymond WILLEY, petitioner, v. C. G. LEWELLYN, formerly collector, etc.; William WALKER, petitioner, v. C. G. LEWELLYN, formerly collector, etc.; R. H. YOUNGMAN, petitioner, v. C. G. LEWELLYN, formerly collector, etc.; Otto M. REIF, petitioner, v. C. G. LEWELLYN, formerly collector, etc.; Elizabeth W. PONTEFRACT, petitioner, v. C. G. LEWELLYN, formerly collector, etc.; William Albert HARBISON, petitioner, v. C. G. LEWELLYN, formerly collector, etc.; Emma J. HARBISON, petitioner, v. C. G. LEWELLYN, formerly collector, etc.; Nin McQUILLEN, petitioner, v. C. G. LEWELLYN, formerly collector, etc.; Kenneth SEAVER, petitioner, v. C. G. LEWELLYN, formerly collector, etc.; P. R. HILLEMAN, petitioner, v. C. G. LEWELLYN, formerly collector, etc.

No. 134.

No. 135.

No. 136.

No. 137.

No. 138.

No. 139.

No. 140.

No. 141.

No. 142.

No. 143.

No. 144.

No. 145.

No. 146.

No. 147.

No. 148.

Supreme Court of the United States

October 14, 1929

and

Messrs. J. E. MacCloskey, Jr., and F. H. Atwood, both of Pittsburgh, Pa., for petitioner Harbison.

Mr. J. E. MacCloskey, Jr., of Pittsburgh, Pa., for other petitioners.

Petition for writs of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ward Baking Corp. v. United States
280 U.S. 561 (Supreme Court, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
280 U.S. 560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harbison-v-c-g-lewellyn-scotus-1929.