Harbin v. Harbin

85 So. 3d 1025, 2011 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 338, 2011 WL 6004629
CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama
DecidedDecember 2, 2011
Docket2100596
StatusPublished

This text of 85 So. 3d 1025 (Harbin v. Harbin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harbin v. Harbin, 85 So. 3d 1025, 2011 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 338, 2011 WL 6004629 (Ala. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinions

MOORE, Judge.

AFFIRMED. NO OPINION.

See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(D & F), Ala. R.App. P.; Rule 701, Ala. R. Evid.; Ala. Code 1975, §§ 30-3-169.3 and 30-3-169.4; Ex parte Foley, 864 So.2d 1094, 1099 (Ala. 2003); Adams v. Adams, 21 So.3d 1247, 1252 (Ala.Civ.App.2009); Cheek v. Dyess, 1 So.3d 1025, 1029 (Ala.Civ.App.2007); [1026]*1026T.J.H. v. S.N.F., 960 So.2d 669, 673 (Ala. Civ.App.2006); Leonard v. Leonard, 479 So.2d 1279, 1281 (Ala.Civ.App.1985); and Newsome v. State, 570 So.2d 703, 714 (Ala. Crim.App.1989).

THOMPSON, P.J., and PITTMAN and THOMAS, JJ., concur. BRYAN, J., concurs in part and dissents in part, with writing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cheek v. Dyess
1 So. 3d 1025 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2007)
Adams v. Adams
21 So. 3d 1247 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2009)
Newsome v. State
570 So. 2d 703 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1990)
Ex Parte Foley
864 So. 2d 1094 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2003)
Knight v. Knight
53 So. 3d 942 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2010)
Leonard v. Leonard
479 So. 2d 1279 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1985)
T.J.H. v. S.N.F.
960 So. 2d 669 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
85 So. 3d 1025, 2011 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 338, 2011 WL 6004629, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harbin-v-harbin-alacivapp-2011.