Harbin v. Flannigan

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Harbin v. Flannigan

95 S.E. 320, 22 Ga. App. 30, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 119

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 13, 1918

Docket9004

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 95 S.E. 320 (Harbin v. Flannigan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harbin v. Flannigan, 95 S.E. 320, 22 Ga. App. 30, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 119 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodwobth, J.

1. Tlie reference in the brief of counsel for the' plaintiff in error to the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial does not amount to an argument, and these grounds will be treated as abandoned. Mills v. State, 19 Ga. App. 623 (1), 624 (91 S. E. 918), and cases cited; Laffitte v. State, 105 Ga. 595 (1), 596 (31 S. E. 540); Moss v. Bohanon, 111 Ga. 871 (36 S. E. 954).

2. There Is evidence to support the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, and this court will not interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI