Harbert's v. Henly

31 Tex. 666
Texas Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 1869·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Morrill, C. J.

—Suit upon a note made by one Shrews-berry, dated 20th March, 1858, payable to Stephen Harbert, or order, at ninety days, calling for $607 83, with twelve per cent, interest from date.

The note was indorsed in blank and without date by the [667]*667payee, by one Logue, and by plaintiff in error’s intestate, on the 30th ¡November, 1860.

Suit was instituted 21st January, 1861, against the maker and last indorser, and service perfected on both defendants on 4th February, 1861.

On October 30, 1865, the plaintiff having suggested the death of the indorser, his administrator was made a party, and the suit ordered to proceed in his name.

On 1st May, 1866, the parties submitted the cause to the judge, waiving a jury, and a judgment was rendered for $1,157 89.

There was no motion made for a new trial, no statement of facts, or bills of exceptions.

Suit was brought at the first term of the district court after the note was assigned to plaintiff. The errors assigned are negatived by statutory enactments, and are too frivolous to notice. The appeal seems to have been prosecuted for delay.

Affirmed with damages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harbert's v. Henly, 31 Tex. 666 (Tex. 1869).

31 Tex. 666 (Harbert's v. Henly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Webster v. International & G. N. Ry. Co.
193 S.W. 179 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1917)
Smyer v. Ft. Worth & Denver City Ry. Co.
154 S.W. 336 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1912)