Harari Restaurant Corp. v. McLaughlin
431 N.E.2d 638, 55 N.Y.2d 730, 447 N.Y.S.2d 153, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 3270
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On summary consideration, order reversed, with costs, and the determination of the State Liquor Authority reinstated. It cannot be said that the penalty imposed was “‘so disproportionate to the offense, in light of all the circumstances, as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness’ ” (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222, 233).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harari Restaurant Corp. v. McLaughlin, 431 N.E.2d 638, 55 N.Y.2d 730, 447 N.Y.S.2d 153, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 3270 (N.Y. 1981).
431 N.E.2d 638 (Harari Restaurant Corp. v. McLaughlin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Coastal Aviation, Inc. v. Commander Aircraft Co.
937 F. Supp. 1051 (S.D. New York, 1996)
PBL Entertainment, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority
195 A.D.2d 267 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Tracy v. State Liquor Authority
492 N.E.2d 788 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
Koire v. Metro Car Wash
707 P.2d 195 (California Supreme Court, 1985)