Harar Realty Corp. v. Michlin & Hill, Inc.
442 N.E.2d 60, 57 N.Y.2d 836, 455 N.Y.S.2d 763, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3734
This text of 442 N.E.2d 60 (Harar Realty Corp. v. Michlin & Hill, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Harar Realty Corp. v. Michlin & Hill, Inc., 442 N.E.2d 60, 57 N.Y.2d 836, 455 N.Y.S.2d 763, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3734 (N.Y. 1982).
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the Court of Appeals does not have jurisdiction to entertain the motion (NY Const, art VI, § 3, subd b, par [7]). Twenty dollars costs and necessary reproduction disbursements to respondent Michlin & Hill, Inc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
442 N.E.2d 60, 57 N.Y.2d 836, 455 N.Y.S.2d 763, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3734, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harar-realty-corp-v-michlin-hill-inc-ny-1982.