Harang v. Dauphin

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Harang v. Dauphin

1 Mart. 640

DecidedJune 15, 1815

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Mart. 640 (Harang v. Dauphin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harang v. Dauphin, 1 Mart. 640 (La. 1815).

Pincite

Opinion

The plaintiff had brought suit for a'trespass on his land, praying that one thousand dollars be allowed him for the injury he had sustained ; and obtained a verdict and judgment for M170, in the Court of the Parish and City of New-Orleans, The defendant prayed an appeal, which was denied him, on the ground that the sum recovered was under 8300, Qn an affidavit of these facts Duncan moved for a mandamus to the Parish Judge commanding him to allow the appeal. The mandamus did issue, and the appeal was allowed. Seethe case, vol. 4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiff had brought suit for a'trespass on his land, praying that one thousand dollars be allowed him for the injury he had sustained ; and obtained a verdict and judgment for M170, in the Court of the Parish and City of New-Orleans, The defendant prayed an appeal, which was denied him, on the ground that the sum recovered was under 8300, Qn an affidavit of these facts Duncan moved for a mandamus to the Parish Judge commanding him to allow the appeal. The mandamus did issue, and the appeal was allowed. Seethe case, vol. 4.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Mart. 640, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harang-v-dauphin-la-1815.