Haram v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Haram v. United States

22 Cust. Ct. 233, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1324

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Haram v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 17 Cust. Ct. 37 →

United States Customs Court·Decided February 1, 1949·No. No. 52862; protests 929410-G, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of cheese similar in all material respects to that the subject of Scaramelli v. United States (9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706), Abstract 42146, and Abstract 48269. In accordance therewith it was held that an allowance of 2J4 percent should have been made in the weight of the cheese by the collector in computing the duty thereon to compensate for the weight of the inedible coverings on the outside of the cheese. The protests were sustained to this extent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of cheese similar in all material respects to that the subject of Scaramelli v. United States (9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706), Abstract 42146, and Abstract 48269. In accordance therewith it was held that an allowance of 2J4 percent should have been made in the weight of the cheese by the collector in computing the duty thereon to compensate for the weight of the inedible coverings on the outside of the cheese. The protests were sustained to this extent.

Haram v. United States, 22 Cust. Ct. 233, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1324 (cusc 1949).

Pincite

22 Cust. Ct. 233 (Haram v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related