Harago v. Bartos
This text of 247 A.D. 717 (Harago v. Bartos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial unanimously modified by granting the motion, unless a decision in writing is made and filed within thirty days after service of order, with notice of entry thereof, and as so modified affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant. No opinion. Present — MeAvoy, Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
247 A.D. 717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harago-v-bartos-nyappdiv-1936.