Haque v. Embassy of Bangladesh

624 F. App'x 5
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedDecember 7, 2015
DocketNo. 15-7071
StatusPublished

This text of 624 F. App'x 5 (Haque v. Embassy of Bangladesh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Haque v. Embassy of Bangladesh, 624 F. App'x 5 (D.C. Cir. 2015).

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed June 19, 2015, be affirmed. The district court correctly determined appellant’s complaint failed to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a), which, among other things, requires a complaint to contain a “short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed. R.Civ.P. 8(a)(2); Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 677-78, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ashcroft v. Iqbal
556 U.S. 662 (Supreme Court, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
624 F. App'x 5, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haque-v-embassy-of-bangladesh-cadc-2015.