Haq v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Haq v. City of New York

251 A.D.2d 45, 672 N.Y.S.2d 719, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6443

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 4, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 251 A.D.2d 45 (Haq v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haq v. City of New York, 251 A.D.2d 45, 672 N.Y.S.2d 719, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6443 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane Solomon, J.), entered April 3, 1997, which, insofar as appealed from, granted defendants-respondents’ motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them, and denied plaintiffs cross motion for disclosure, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The action was properly dismissed as against defendants-respondents for failure to adduce any evidence that any of them made any repairs to, or otherwise created the alleged unsafe condition on, the sidewalk near where plaintiff fell (see, Balsam v Delma Eng’g Corp., 139 AD2d 292, 298, lv denied 73 NY2d 783), or to explain how further disclosure might reveal such repairs or other possible fault for creating the alleged unsafe condition. Concur — Milonas, J. P., Wallach, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane Solomon, J.), entered April 3, 1997, which, insofar as appealed from, granted defendants-respondents’ motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them, and denied plaintiffs cross motion for disclosure, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The action was properly dismissed as against defendants-respondents for failure to adduce any evidence that any of them made any repairs to, or otherwise created the alleged unsafe condition on, the sidewalk near where plaintiff fell (see, Balsam v Delma Eng’g Corp., 139 AD2d 292, 298, lv denied 73 NY2d 783), or to explain how further disclosure might reveal such repairs or other possible fault for creating the alleged unsafe condition. Concur — Milonas, J. P., Wallach, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

251 A.D.2d 45, 672 N.Y.S.2d 719, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haq-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack