Happ Bros. v. Montgomery

102 S.E. 555, 25 Ga. App. 99, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 619
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 18, 1920
Docket11139
StatusPublished

This text of 102 S.E. 555 (Happ Bros. v. Montgomery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Happ Bros. v. Montgomery, 102 S.E. 555, 25 Ga. App. 99, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 619 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

Smith, J.

The motion for a new trial being based upon the general grounds only, and the evidence, though conflicting, being sufficient to support the verdict, this case falls within the well-settled rule that under such circumstances the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, will not be. controlled.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 S.E. 555, 25 Ga. App. 99, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/happ-bros-v-montgomery-gactapp-1920.