Hapgood v. Whitman

13 Mass. 464
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided October 15, 1816·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

The words, one half of the land hereafter described, and one half of all the land contained icithin the bounds hereafter mentioned, necessarily apply to the land which is the subject of this suit; although these words are not repeated in that part of [372]*372the deed which conveyed this particular' lot. The terms and also, which introduce the description of the land in question, show that the same portion of the land was intended to be granted as of that described in the preceding part.

Defendant defaulted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hapgood v. Whitman, 13 Mass. 464 (Mass. 1816).

13 Mass. 464 (Hapgood v. Whitman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Golden v. Pilchuck Tribe No. 42, Improved Order of Red Men
129 P. 93 (Washington Supreme Court, 1913)
Kennebec & Portland Railroad v. Portland & Kennebec Railroad
59 Me. 9 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1871)
Presbrey v. Presbrey
95 Mass. 281 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1866)
Town of Cheshire v. Town of Burlington
31 Conn. 326 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1863)
Hastings v. Lane
15 Me. 134 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1838)
Thayer v. Seavey
11 Me. 284 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1834)