Haole v. State

Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided October 6, 2020·No. SCPW-20-0000567·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX

06-OCT-2020

01:59 PM

SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

KIPP HAOLE, Petitioner,

vs.

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Wilson, JJ., and Circuit Judge Remigio, assigned by reason of vacancy)

Upon consideration of petitioner Kipp Haole’s petition for writ of habeas corpus, filed on September 16, 2020, and the record, it appears that petitioner presents no special reason for this court to invoke its jurisdiction and has alternative means to seek the requested relief. See Oili v. Chang, 54 Haw. 411, 412, 557 P.2d 787, 788 (1976) (“[The supreme] court will not exercise its original jurisdiction in habeas corpus proceedings when relief is available in a lower court and no special reason exists for invoking its jurisdiction.”). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the appellate court shall process the petition for writ of habeas corpus without payment of the filing fees.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, October 6, 2020.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Catherine H. Remigio

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haole v. State, (haw 2020).

Haole v. State (Haole v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Oili v. Chang
557 P.2d 787 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1976)
In Re Honolulu Rapid Transit Company, Ltd.
507 P.2d 755 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1973)