Haole v. State
This text of Haole v. State (Haole v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 06-OCT-2020 01:59 PM
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
KIPP HAOLE, Petitioner,
vs.
STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Wilson, JJ., and Circuit Judge Remigio, assigned by reason of vacancy)
Upon consideration of petitioner Kipp Haole’s petition
for writ of habeas corpus, filed on September 16, 2020, and the
record, it appears that petitioner presents no special reason for
this court to invoke its jurisdiction and has alternative means
to seek the requested relief. See Oili v. Chang, 54 Haw. 411,
412, 557 P.2d 787, 788 (1976) (“[The supreme] court will not
exercise its original jurisdiction in habeas corpus proceedings
when relief is available in a lower court and no special reason
exists for invoking its jurisdiction.”). Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of
habeas corpus is denied. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the
appellate court shall process the petition for writ of habeas
corpus without payment of the filing fees.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, October 6, 2020.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
/s/ Catherine H. Remigio
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Haole v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haole-v-state-haw-2020.